SETI and the Galactic Belt of Intelligent Life

Béla A. Balázs


Department of Astronomy, L. Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary



Abstract:

The gravitational density wave theory of Lin and his co-workers involves the formation of stars along a rather concentrated shock front which co-rotates with the spiral pattern as a rigid body around the galactic center. The locus of star formation is expected to move according to the pattern velocity which - in view of the differential rotation of the Galaxy - generally departs from the circular velocity of stars and interstellar clouds (except at a critical distance from the center: at the co-rotation radius) and thus one could expect to find systematic effects in the shifts of spiral arm tracers of different ages. If we assume that the case of mankind is about average and accept the idea that the longevity of a civilization might be limited with high probability by catastrophic events, threatening during the crossing of the galactic arms, intelligent life is presumably concentrated on a belt in the Galaxy which is a narrow annulus including the co-rotation circle and the galactic orbit of our sun. If the "Galactic Belt of Intelligent Life" is a reality at least the first and last factors in the 'Drake Equation' must be reassessed. From heliocentric point of view the distribution of our potential extraterrestrial partners is highly anisotropic: in a small solid angle around the line of sight there are about thousand times as many of them in the tangential directions than towards the galactic center or anticenter.


What is the distribution of intelligent life in the Galaxy? A simple question, an exciting question and clearly a question whose answer is most difficult to achieve. But it is a question that surely should be asked and answered in order to elaborate a suitable search strategy, and a question which is impossible to answer professionally without taking into account the geometric and kinematic properties of our stellar system. Estimates of the likelihood, galactic distribution and accessibility of extra-terrestrial civilizations generally contain three shortcomings: They treat our Galaxy as a homogeneous, isotropic and steady-state system and not as an object of well-known kinematics and reasonably well understood morphology and path of evolution.

The gravitational density wave theory of Lin [1] is one of the most suitable of theories which can provide an acceptable quantitative viewpoint from which it is possible to explain the large-scale geometry and dynamics of the galactic spiral structure in a coherent way. This theory involves the formation of stars along a rather concentrated shock front that co-rotates with the spiral pattern as a rigid body around the galactic center. Even if one finds that clumping is the most typical feature of galactic disk distribution, there is an overall large-scale pattern of spiral arms, which can roughly be approximated by logarithmic curves of the form:


equation9

In the linear density wave theory the average age difference (tex2html_wrap_inline156) between us and another planetary system with heliocentric galactic coordinates r, l, b can be written in the form:

equation12

[where m is the number of spiral arms, tex2html_wrap_inline158 is the angular pattern speed (tex2html_wrap_inline160), tex2html_wrap_inline162 is the galactic rotation curve, tex2html_wrap_inline164 is the surface density distribution in the galactic plane and tex2html_wrap_inline166 is the radial velocity dispersion of the stars].

The angular pattern speed is one of the most important model parameters and according to Lin's group equals tex2html_wrap_inline168tex2html_wrap_inline170 (in satisfactory agreement with the empirical data).

In the early seventies L. S. Marochnik and his co-workers [2] pointed out that since the bulk of the galactic mass is concentrated in subsystems with a large velocity dispersion, the properties of the spiral density-waves are actually governed not by the total mass of the Galaxy, but by a small portion of it associated with the extremely flat sub-system of stars having a small velocity dispersion. Equ. (1) contains therefore only the density tex2html_wrap_inline172 of this flat subsystem which differs strongly from the total surface density in both magnitude and space distribution. Marochnik et al. found that only with tex2html_wrap_inline172 close to 40tex2html_wrap_inline176 and tex2html_wrap_inline158 close to 23tex2html_wrap_inline170 are we able to obtain a spiral structure which is in good agreement with the large scale distribution of neutral hydrogen in the Galaxy.

It appears, therefore, that not the outermost HII regions but the objects in the solar neighborhood lie in the zone of co-rotation. The rather small value of tex2html_wrap_inline182 is empirically supported by an early work of A. Blaauw [3] who found that the associations in the solar neighborhood (d<1kpc) consist of a number of subsystems of different ages. The distances between the subsystems (10-40pc) are of the same order of magnitude as the sizes of the subsystems themselves, the age difference between the neighboring subsystems is about tex2html_wrap_inline186years. In view of this the physical mechanism which initiated the birth of this subsystems must have had a linear velocity between 5 and 10tex2html_wrap_inline188 which is in good agreement with a small tex2html_wrap_inline190, but entirely incompatible with the large relative velocity proposed by Lin. The smallness of tex2html_wrap_inline190 is also supported e.g. by a former work of A. H. Nelson and T. Matsuda [4], investigating one-dimensional galactic spiral shocks, by B. A. Balázs [5], investigating the spatial distribution of open clusters of various ages and by recent papers of P. Grosbol and P. A. Patsis [6] (BVIK surface photometry of five ordinary spiral galaxies) and Yu. N. Mishurov at al. [7-8] (investigation of the line-of-sight velocity field of Cepheids).

It is easy to see that in this case the age of the solar system is comparable with the period during which the Sun remains between two spiral arms. Its radial phase (tex2html_wrap_inline194) between the Sagittarius and Perseus arms corresponds to an tex2html_wrap_inline158 value of 24.7tex2html_wrap_inline170 (if tex2html_wrap_inline200 = 25). As it is known that in the vicinity of the Sun the galactic rotation curve is linear with a slope of tex2html_wrap_inline202, where A is Oort's galactic rotation constant, the co-rotation radius comes to


equation42

If Rtex2html_wrap_inline204 = 10kpc and A = 15tex2html_wrap_inline170 tex2html_wrap_inline208 comes to 10.1tex2html_wrap_inline210. (Taking say 8kpc for the galactocentric distance of our Sun, the whole picture shrinks, but the striking proximity remains.)

Now, if we following Shklovskii, Clark, Clube, Marochnik [9-12] and others accept the idea, that the longevity of a civilization might be limited with a high probability by close supernova explosions and impacts of large comets, the life expectancy of advanced civilizations is the time which their system spends between two neighboring spiral arms where the occurrence of fatal cosmic events is rendered unlikely and the belt of extraterrestrial civilizations presents itself as a surprisingly narrow one!

With regard to the age of the solar system, objects with tex2html_wrap_inline212 which left the Sagittarius arm or the Perseus one, in the direction of the galactic rotation tex2html_wrap_inline214years ago have by now just reached the other arm and conversely, objects with the same age and parent arm, but with tex2html_wrap_inline216 have similarly traveled the whole way in the opposite direction between the two spirals.

 

figure53

Figure 1: The ``Galactic Belt of Life'' in the Galaxy. G is the galactic center; C, tex2html_wrap_inline218, D, tex2html_wrap_inline220, E, tex2html_wrap_inline222 are the intersections of the spiral arms with the circle of corotation and the belt edges.

Denoting the galactocentric radius of these objects by tex2html_wrap_inline224 and making use of eqn. (2) we get


equation58

for the half width of the belt where we can primarily expect advanced civilizations. (Fig. 1)

If we take into account that there is a sort of incubation spread in the process of star formation and therefore stars which were born owing to the same large-scale compression of the interstellar medium (by the density wave) are not completely coeval, the half width of the belt becomes only insignificantly different from the previous one. Changing the unit of tex2html_wrap_inline226 into nanoradian/yr eqn (2) leads to


equation63

Multiplying both sides of (4) by tex2html_wrap_inline228 and inserting tex2html_wrap_inline224 we get


equation70

and so


equation84



Allowing an age spread of tex2html_wrap_inline232yr, eqn (7) leads to a minor change of only 0.005kpc in tex2html_wrap_inline224 .

It is known that basically as a reaction against exaggerated subservience to the copernican principle Brandon Carter [13] in the early seventies introduced the so called anthropic principle, which in its weak form declares that we must be prepared to take account of the fact that our location in the universe is necessarily privileged to the extent of being compatible with our existence as observers.

Now, if we assume that the case of mankind is about average and accept the idea that highly developed planet-dwelling life is not likely to survive the catastrophic events threatening during the crossings of spiral arms, our very presence and the possibility to discuss extra-terrestrial contact problems shows that we and our potential non space-faring partners live close to the galactic circle of co-rotation ('kinematic ecosphere').

There are thus morphological arguments favoring the concept of a belt of civilizations based on a kinematic ecosphere in the Galaxy in the form of an annulus with a breadth of roughly 0.5kpc including the galactic orbit of our Sun. We should concentrate our efforts to contact extraterrestrial beings on this narrow belt (Fig. 1).

If the galactic belt of intelligent life is a reality the first and last factors in the famous Drake Equation (see f.i. Kreifeldt [14]) must be reconsidered. As far as tex2html_wrap_inline236 the number of potentially suitable parent stars is concerned, only stars in the belt of life can be regarded. As the volume of the ring comes about 6tex2html_wrap_inline238, the stellar density tex2html_wrap_inline2400.13*/tex2html_wrap_inline242 and roughly 10% of the stars have long lasting habitable zones (see f. i. Tucker [15]), tex2html_wrap_inline236 is only about tex2html_wrap_inline246!

One can see at the first glance, that from heliocentric point of view the distribution of the suitable stars is highly anizotropic. Choosing f. i. a typical solid angle of tex2html_wrap_inline248sr and taking again D = 0.13*/tex2html_wrap_inline242, one deals with tex2html_wrap_inline252 in the first case and tex2html_wrap_inline254 objects in the second one. As only around 10% of the stars have long lasting habitable zones tex2html_wrap_inline236 is in our case tex2html_wrap_inline258 and 4, respectively.

As regards tex2html_wrap_inline260 the lifetime of a planet during which highly developed species can exist on it, tex2html_wrap_inline260 can also be judged by astronomical methods. It is basically limited by the evolution of the parent star and by stellar kinematic factors.

Limitations of the first type are governed by the mass M of a star. Stars with nearly the mass of the sun have main-sequence lifetimes (cp. Zuckerman [16]):


equation99

Regarding factors of the second type, tex2html_wrap_inline260 is limited by the crossing time tex2html_wrap_inline266 which a planetary system spends between two spiral arms. Changing the unit of tex2html_wrap_inline226 into tex2html_wrap_inline270yrs eqn. (4) leads to


equation105

It is easy to see that for the given galactic rotation curve and tex2html_wrap_inline158, tex2html_wrap_inline266 is inversely proportional to the distance from the co-rotation circle:


equation110


references114